I bought the system upon release. Essentially it is a martingale – 10% each time you win a hand. I assume it is -10% so he can fit in more bets before hitting the table limit. And that is it not really much to report.

The “system” says you must wait for a 9 win streak before quitting. No explanation is given as to why it must be this magical 9-win streak (although I suspect it is down to table limits).

Also, you must start your bets at £3.  I assume this system was created so that you spend as much money as possible in the casinos he recommends so that he can get the maximum kickbacks from them.

The system also comes with a standard perfect strategy card, allegedly lowering the house edge to 0.8%

He claims to have a “secret formula”, but since when is playing perfect strategy with a martingale “secret”? This is the second most common BJ system on the planet, the first being a martingale on each loss.

RATING 1/5 Not worth paying £37 for information that’s readily available on the internet.

Click Here To Visit The Blackjack System Website

So, the price is currently £29 but the web site indicates a rise to £49.  (It actually says increases will occur in 3 days, but I have had the system for 3 days and the increase has not occurred!!!) The package consists of a 12-page PDF copy of the system (meaning it is accessible) there is also an email service, which forwards selections, without using the manual selection process (although the system is simple, these services are useful). The service is offered for a single payment of  £39.95.

The presentation is professional, with screen shots of sites used to make selections.  Although the system is only 12 pages, it is precise and concise with no padding to make the manual seem more appealing.  However, there are comments made in following section regarding the system (see below). The system uses only 3 selection steps!!! And everything is covered in how to make selections.  In the manual, each step includes clear screen shots and instructions; and has web links to areas where information can be found.  (I have reservations regarding the system, but this is covered later).  The manual also contains a money management system, which is essential when making profits from gambling; and seems to use a common sense approach. The price seems acceptable for this type of manual, but attention needs to be given to the sales pitch regarding increasing the price.

So, any adverse comments:?!  Well, when initially reading the system, it indicates 2 distances on which selections are made (sorry if being vague, but I am trying not to reveal the exact system).  It became slightly confusing whether these were 2 specific distances, or whether the system uses races falling between these distances.  It only became clear when the author gave an example.  Inserting the word “between”, when giving distances, would prevent this confusion and provide faith in the system (which sadly is lacking – but more later)

Another comment; the author advises to flit around the racing post web site, to obtain various selection information.  However, click on the days first race meet, scroll through to find possible selections, click on the race, then click the selected horse to obtain information required.  This is much easier and all information is available from the race card. This flitting about (not necessary) dilutes the faith I have in this system. These may seem trivial, but I feel, systems presented to paying punters, must be accurate and time effective.  If this system used more than 3 steps to make selections, this would not be the case. Tweaking the manuals presentation is needed to ensure the system is correctly understood and time management is minimised.

So, what is my initial perception?  Well! Firstly. I agree, make systems as simple as possible so bets can be tunefully placed.  I also agree with not “padding” manuals with irrelevant information – i.e. including lengthy autobiographies; or how to use betfair; or a lengthy synopsis of how systems were developed; but this system takes streamlining to a new degree. We need some author credentials of experience and knowledge, which allow them to produce systems.  We also need brief descriptions of how systems developed and data proving systems work.  Without this, I become very sceptical and this was my reaction on first reading.

Honestly; it seems the author picked his lucky number, then devised what seems “a fad system” to accompany this.  The web site claims have little, if any long term proof of claims, just single winning bets!  I expect; at least on web sites; a section showing previous trial statistics for claims being made. The web site claims this system is no gimmick, but is exactly how it feels, with no counterclaims to defend the system!!!  However, I said I would test the system and “ours is not to reason why, ours is just to buy and try”.  So, will it stand real live testing?

To be honest, the system is self-explanatory and using only 3 steps, can be executed over a whole race card in minutes.  However, as mentioned, I have reservations, as the system seems too simplistic.  It does not seem to use sufficient data to enable it to be taken seriously, but live tests will prove whether this system produces high success rates.

Results of implementing System!

N.B. For the purpose of the trial, and because I do not always use betfair, I am using the rule; one quarter odds for a second place and one fifth odds for third and fourth place.  Using this ensures consistency.  I am starting with a £500 account, using the simple money management system the manual provides i.e. each way bets of 1 betting stake win and 1 betting stake place for all races.

11 Dec 2009

18.50 – Wolverhampton – All Of Me [IRE] – Not placed – 5th – 11/1
20.50 – Wolverhampton – Feeling [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 14/1

Staking plan gains/losses    -4 staking points

12 Dec 2009

12.40 – SOUTHWELL – JONNIE SKULL [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 15/8F
14.40 – SOUTHWELL – DISTANT DREAMER [USA] – Not placed – 9th – 50/1
15.30 – SOUTHWELL – NAOMH GEILEIS [USA] – Placed 3rd – 13/8 Jt F
18.20 – WOLVERHAMPTON – GOODBYE CASH [IRE] – Not placed – 5th – 14/1
18.50 – WOLVERHAMPTON – LUCKYDOLLY [IRE] – Not placed – 5th – 16/1
20.50 – WOLVERHAMPTON – JUST BOND [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 3/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -10.675 staking points

N.B. The email selection service gives the second race as 14.40, but the actual race should be the 14.20???

13 Dec 2009

17.25 – KEMPTON – LUCKY SCORE [IRE] – Not placed – 5th – 5/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -2 staking points

14 Dec 2009

17.50 – WOLVERHAMPTON -  KING´S JESTER [IRE] – Not placed – 10th – 33/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -2 staking points

15 Dec 2009

13.40 – SOUTHWELL – GAILY NOBLE [IRE] – Not placed – 8th – 12/1
15.10 – SOUTHWELL – DESERT MILE [IRE] – Not placed – 9th – 50/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -4 staking points

16 Dec 2009

12.30 – LINGFIELD – FREDDIE´S GIRL [USA] – Finished 2nd – 22/1
13.00 – LINGFIELD – ROCK THE STARS [IRE] – Not placed – 9th – 16/1
14.10 – LINGFIELD – SHARPAZMAX [IRE] – Not places – last – 5/1
14.45 – LINGFIELD – BINNION BAY [IRE] – Non runner – No bet
18.20 – KEMPTON – JAZZ AGE [IRE] – Not placed – 5th – 33/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -0.5 staking points

17 Dec 2009

14:30 – Southwell – Mcconnel [USA] – Won – 4/9F
15:30 – Southwell – Plenilune [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 25/1
17:00 – Wolverhampton – Battimoore [IRE] – Not placed – 9th – 14/1
17:30 – Wolverhampton – Creevy [IRE] – Not placed – 6th – 16/1
18:00 – Wolverhampton – Red Somerset [USA] – Not placed – 9th – 33/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -6.44 staking points

18 Dec 2009

15.15 – SOUTHWELL – LUISA TETRAZZINI [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 9/1
18.20 – WOLVERHAMPTON – ELLA WOODCOCK [IRE] – Not places – 5th – 9/4
19.50 – WOLVERHAMPTON – RAVI RIVER [IRE] – Not placed – 6th – 14/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -6 staking points

19 Dec 2009

12.50 – LINGFIELD – MINORTRANSGRESSION [USA] – Not placed – 4th – 20/1
13.55 – LINGFIELD – STRIKER TORRES [IRE] – Won – 15/2
14.30 – LINGFIELD – SAPHIRA´S FIRE [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 5/2
15.30 – WOLVERHAMPTON – CONCORDE KISS [USA] – Not placed – 5th – 50/1
16.00 – WOLVERHAMPTON – BACK TO PARIS [IRE] – Not placed – 5th – 8/1

Staking plan gains/lossed  +3.375 staking points

N.B. The 13.55 was actually held at Wolverhampton and not Lingfield

20 Dec 2009

15.45 – KEMPTON – LITENUP [IRE] – Not placed –9th – 33/1
16.15 – KEMPTON – WINTER FEVER [SAF] – Not placed – Last – 50/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -4 staking points

21 Dec 2009

14.30 – KEMPTON – DVINSKY [USA] – Not placed – 6th – 7/1
16.05 – KEMPTON – BAUNAGAIN [IRE] – Finished 3rd – 33/1

Staking plan gains/losses  +4.6 staking points

22 Dec 2009

12:55 – Southwell – Ingleby Arch [USA] – Finished 2nd – 7/2

Staking plan gains/losses +0.875 staking points

N.B. No racing until 26 Dec

26 Dec 2009

15:20 – Wolverhampton – WELLMARKED [IRE] – Won – 9/2
16:25 – Wolverhampton – SUPERCAST [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 16/1

Staking plan gains/losses  +5.625 staking points

27 Dec 2009

14:50 – SOUTHWELL – FLORES SEA [USA] – Not placed – 8th – 11/2
15:25 – SOUTHWELL – CONVINCE [USA – None runner

Staking plan gains/losses  -2 staking points

28 Dec 2009

14:40 – WOLVERHAMPTON – SWISS ART [IRE] – Not placed – 5th – 11/1

15:45 – WOLVERHAMPTON – RUBENSTAR [IRE] – Finished 2nd – 14/1

16:15 – WOLVERHAMPTON – SIR GEORGE [IRE] – Finished 2nd – 5/2F

17:15 – WOLVERHAMPTON – LINDY HOP [IRE] – Not placed – 5th – 25/1

Staking plan gains/losses  +0.125 staking points

N.B. No email service was sent today (even though this is a paid for service).

29 Dec 2009

No selections today

30 Dec 2009

12.20 – Lingfield – MAY PARKIN  [IRE] – None runner
15.35 – Lingfield – DEN´S GIFT  [IRE] – Finished 2nd – 5/2F

Staking plan gains/losses  +0.625 staking points

31 Dec 2009

12.30 – Lingfield – KATCHMORE [IRE] – Finished 2nd – 15/2
13.30 – Lingfield – BOOKIES INDEX GIRL [IRE] – Won – 11/1
15.30 – Lingfield – BAUNAGAIN [IRE] – Not placed – 6th – 15/2

Staking plan gains/losses  +15.625 staking points

1 Jan 2010

14.40 – Southwell – CITY GOSSIP [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 5/2

Staking plan gains/losses  -2 staking points

2 Jan 2010

12.55 – Southwell – TAMASOU [IRE] – Finished 3rd – 11/2
13.05 – Lingfield – ANT MUSIC [IRE] – Finished 3rd – 7/1
14.10 – Lingfield – DR WINTRINGHAM [IRE] – Not placed – 9th – 9/2
14.40 – Lingfield – ERINJAY [IRE] – None runner

Staking plan gains/losses  +0.5 staking points

3 Jan 2010

14.35 – Kempton – MISTER GREEN [IRE] – Not placed – 5th – 4/1JF
16.35 – Kempton – THE MOUSE CARROL [IRE] – Not placed – 6th – 33/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -4 staking points

4 Jan 2010

15.35 – WOLVERHAMPTON – QUINCE [IRE] – None runner

16.35 – WOLVERHAMPTON – MIGHTY MOVER [IRE] – Not placed – 7th – 7/1

17.05 – WOLVERHAMPTON – PUSH ME [IRE] – Finished 3rd – 8/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -0.4 staking points

N.B. No email service received, even though selections available.

5 Jan 2010

13.40 – Southwell -  JONNIE SKULL [IRE] – None runner
14.10 – Southwell – BORASCO [USA] – Finished 2nd – 5/2F

Staking plan gains/losses  +0.625 staking points

N.B. Email service arrived but said for 3 Jan not 5 Jan???

6 Jan 2010

13.00 – Lingfield – RONDEAU [GR] – Cancelled
14.00 – Lingfield – HALLINGDAL [UAE] – Cancelled
14.30 – Lingfield – CREEVY [IRE] – Cancelled
15.00 – Lingfield – BETTER BE BLUE [IRE] – Cancelled
17.20 – Kempton – MAFEKING [UAE] – Cancelled
18.50 – Kempton – VAINGLORY [USA] – Cancelled

N.B. Due to severe weather conditions, Lingfield and Kempton races abandoned

7 Jan 2009

15.10 – Southwell – PLENILUNE [IRE] – Not placed – Last – 7/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -2 staking points

8 Jan 2009

15.30 – LINGFIELD – WOOLSTON FERRY [IRE] – Not placed – 9th – 20/1

16.00 – LINGFIELD – GREY BOY [GER] – Not placed – 6th – 20/1

13.45 – SOUTHWELL – GRACIES GIFT [IRE] – Not placed – Last – 5/2

14.45 – SOUTHWELL – SAIRAAM [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 13/2

Staking plan gains/losses  -8 staking points

N.B. No email service received, even though selections available

9 Jan 2009

13.55 – KEMPTON – PLAYFUL ASSET [IRE] – Not placed – 4th – 6/1

15.55 – KEMPTON – HATHAWAY [IRE] – Finished 3rd – 8/1

15.10 – LINGFIELD – LEARO DOCHAIS [USA] – Not placed – 5th – 10/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -2.4 staking points

N.B. No email service received, even though selections available

10 Jan 2009

No selections today

N.B. No email service received.

11 Jan 2009

15.30 – Wolverhampton – JUST JIMMY [IRE] – Not placed – 7th – 5/1
16.45 – Kempton – VALENTINO SWING [IRE] – None runner
17.15 – Kempton – CAVALRY GUARD [USA] – Not placed – 6th – 16/1
14.15 – Kempton – CAPTAIN COOL [IRE] – Finished 2nd – 7/2

Staking plan gains/losses  -3.125 staking points

12 Jan 2009

15.05 – Lingfield – DREAM EXPRESS [IRE] – Not placed – 8th – 6/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -2 staking points

13 Jan 2009

18.45 – KEMPTON – DESERT DREAMER [IRE] – Not placed – 7^th – 12/1

Staking plan gains/losses  -2 staking points

N.B. No email service arrived, even though selections available.

14 Jan 2009

14.30 – LINGFIELD – TAKAJAN [IRE] – Finished 2^nd – 7/2

14.50 – SOUTHWELL – VERTIGO ON COURSE [IRE] – Finished 3^rd – 5/1

Staking plan gains/losses  +1.875 staking points

N.B. No email service arrived, even though selections available.

The author includes money management with the system.  In my opinion, all betting systems should include money management, as this determines potential losses, which may occur. The money management seems adequate, but with my scepticism of the system, my initial bankroll is £500 (common when testing new systems) and I indicate daily gains/losses, to compare strike rates. As mentioned, I will see if the system lives up to its claims under live test conditions, seeing if the money management system is sufficient.

Unlike the rest of this review, this section was completed after the test period.  I feel this only fair, to test the system as originally intended.  Here are my opinions.

Overall stats

System tested over 32 days (as 2 days had no runners)

System produced –33.69 staking points = -£168.45 if using money management

System had 4 wins; 9 second places; and 7 third places from 82 selections

System gives strike rate of 24.39%

System would produce laying strike rate of  95.12%

The system author uses extremely limited data to choose horses and this seems the reason for astonishingly low strike rate (24.39%) and total losses of £168.45 from the initial starting bank using £5 stakes as suggested. Considering statistics, the author would produce much better strike rates as a laying system and would certainly have been in profit. As my initial suspicions indicated, this system probably produces similar strike rates to ones choosing favourite numbers to back horses, or even choosing horses blindfolded.  As a laying system, it would produce much more profit, but I feel credibility is lacking and lay results only arose by chance.  I suggest not even purchasing this system for lay options as selections are not stable enough, but the lay option would have been a more accurate way to market the system.

System Extras!

As mentioned, an email service is available, but comes at a price.  Although email services are convenient, with this system only being 3 steps, I feel this service does not warrant the cost The service states all selections are sent before 11.30 each race day.  During testing, this was the case, the latest I received the service was 11.10.  However, during the test, there where incidents where wrong information was given for selections, (including times and courses) and incidents where selections where not even sent by email. I feel, when paying for services, these issues should never occur. Information should be thoroughly checked then sent every day regardless, if not, reputations quickly fail. This, along with poor system performance (as seen above) does not provide faith in the system and in my opinion, I would stay well clear if considering as a professional gambling tool.

The upsell e-book entitled Trap the Winner, is based on backing horses and relies on checking the draw bias at certain race courses, obviously this only applies to flat racing. Apart from using some additional criteria from the Racing Post I don’t believe that there is anything new for the experienced punter as draw bias will always be a factor in certain sprint handicaps, especially in large fields. This book is not something I would recommend as a purchase. Disappointingly there are no previous results to show, simply a staking plan showing you how you can win all of this Tax Free money!

CONCLUSION

What can I say?  The system, in my opinion, is a complete sham.  The web site provides little data to back up claims, and sales letters only provide single instances where wins occurred.  This is not good enough, and in my opinion, is a “money making scam” which cheats paying public.  Harsh words, but statistics in this report are proof.  If back testing stats were available (as with systems I currently use) these would have shown the system is not as good as advertised. Where these excluded so the system had at least some chance of earning the author some quick cash?

The author claims over 20 years betting experience.  Sounds good, but I know people having over 40 years experience, however this is always a losing streak! The system uses extremely limited data to select the horses, which over time becomes very damaging to bankroll profits.  Most systems I use to produce profit, generally use at least 4 pieces of statistical data to produce selections.  Any less and strike rates quickly diminishes to below 50%. A system producing strike rates of below 25% can be considered disastrous.  I believe technical date says pure chance produces around 30% strike rate, so it seems picking horses blindfolded would produce similar, if not better profits. This, along with unreliability of email service definitely indicates, in my opinion, this “fad” betting system does not enter my library, not even as a laying system. I feel the laying stats were pure chance and I rely on more than chance when placing bets.

Rating 1/5 – Leave well alone and advise colleagues the same.  I believe this system a complete waste of money and similar, if not better strike rates could be duplicated devising simple systems yourself, e.g. only choosing jockeys who wear green as their colour and ride Irish horses. Back each horse each way!!! In fact, paper test this, as I feel this rule would produce very similar strike rates as the Lucky seven system

Click Here To Visit Lucky 7even Website

GeeGeez Lays as the name suggests is a lay bets service, the selections are provided  by the vendor from a password protected site, also available with this system is a free betting bot by the name of GLS Bot, this will lay the GeeGeez Lays for you without you being present at the computer at race time.

The amount of selections per day is variable, from a few to many, there are also days where multiple selections appear in a single race, no selections however, are sent on a Sunday.

Selections are available from 5am on the day of racing via a password protected web site or they can be automatically imported to the supplied robot that will place the bets for you at the time of your choosing. All the results in this review are based on using the robot and the recommended minimum/maximum odds.

The user selectable timing for the placing of the selections is in my opinion absolutely paramount, therefore any two users could report different returns depending on the time interval requested before the race starts.

3 month Results using a bank of 100 points at £5 a point on Betfair.  Level stakes throughout.

Actual Lay Bets Placed in July: 178

157 Lays were Successful:                     88.2%

21 Lays were Unsuccessful:                   11.80% (Odds varied from 2.34 to 19.5)

Overall Profit  for the Month:                 £43.70 – Subscription (£40) = £3.70

Average Odds for All Lays in July         9.30

Average Odds for Unsuccessful Lays    7.69 (i.e. The 11.8% that won)

Actual Lay Bets Placed in August: 209

186 Lays were Successful:                      89.0%

23 Lays were Unsuccessful:                   11.0%

Overall Loss for the Month:                  -£88.85 + Subscription (£40) = -£128.85

Average Odds for All Lays in July:        9.50

Average Odds for Unsuccessful Lays:    9.14 (i.e. the 11. 0% that won)

Actual Lay Bets Placed in September: 184

163 Lays were Successful:                           88.6%

21 Lays were Unsuccessful:                         11.4%

Overall Loss for the Month:                        -£178.10 + Subscription (£40) = -£218.10

Average Odds for All Lays in September:    9.19

Average Odds for Unsuccessful Lays:          10.1 (i.e. The 11.4% that won)

Total Profit/Loss:  -£263.25

I have carried out this review over a three month period as I felt that one month would probably not do this system justice. Had I based my final review on the month of July alone, my analysis of this system may well have been neutral, the longer period has changed my views and bank considerably.

Overall then a truly disastrous result, not only for me personally but for the other subscribers to this system, some of whom may very well be unlucky to have taken an annual subscription. The loss in the bank together with the subscription costs add up to a very unhealthy position. Unfortunately the end of this review sees me in negative territory.

in my view, the subscriptions for this service are more than its worth (3 month subscription to the service cost me around £120,) and, as can be seen in the period of this review, not remotely successful, it may well be, that the system may show a profit in the longer term but I have to ask myself if the expense of continuing with a further extended subscription is worthwhile…… well, that has to be a resounding NO.

Rating: 1/5 High subscription rates and low monthly returns make this system unusable

Click here to visit the GeeGeez Lays Website

£883.01 in 1 day…
£1,520.67 in 7 days…
£4,804.54 in 30 days…

Unfortunately there are no statistics within the e-book to verify these claims, and not much to report.  The system in itself is simple to operate and will produce some winning bets, but I would like to see the proofed results.

(With selections given in advance of racing) Returning to the actual “salvation” process, the method for selecting horses has been around for a number of years and is basically a common sense approach, the only advance on a previous system is utilising certain data from the racing post newspaper.

The e-book has the usual padding explaining how to open a Betfair account and how Betfair works, all well and good but this information is freely available from Betfair!  There are a couple of other systems given at the end of the book, which are useful but again this type of information is freely available to all punters, if they simply look hard enough (and search google!).

The e-book also contains various staking plans, some of which discuss betting tax, which has not been around in the UK for a long time. Unfortunately, the e-book does require some proof reading to correct grammar etc, and one glaring mistake regarding not backing below Betfair odds of 1.5 then immediately stating that 1.3 is an acceptable figure?

My verdict 1/5 Repackaging information that’s readily available.  Definitely not something I would pay £57 for.

Click Here To Visit Betting Salvation Website

This wasn’t exactly off-putting as understandably these thing do happen but interestingly, within a day of losing that bet, I received an interesting email from someone who claims to be “from the inside”, I copy and paste the entire email below for your reference (or entertainment?):

— On Mon, 3/8/09, expert-bet.com (Steve) wrote:

From: expert-bet.com (Steve)
Subject: System!?
Received: Monday, 3 August, 2009, 7:21 AM

Hi,

My name is Steve and I’m a member of Mark Riley’s expert-bet.com team. I
have only this newsletter to tell you that I’m a first member who will leave
this team.

I’m a designer of this system and a lot more but some of members of expert
team are too greedy. and they just want cash, cash, cash…. I told them that
this system is designed only for major leagues and we should sell only
system to customers. Premium picks should be free for those customers.

But no, they want to test my system on other leagues – but they failed!!!
LOST MATCH TODAY!!!

There are only 20-30 such bets per year. But of course… why not to sell
more?? Well, NOT ME!!

Copies of bookmakers account are mine, system is mine, 100% truly sure
picks are mine… I don’t need to steal others people money! I’m a honest guy
and my name won’t be under expert-bet anymore!

What should you do?
Definitely ask for refund! Or you can try your luck with them.

But did you solve the problem? No. You lost. It is true there is always up
and down with sports betting but with a reliable tipster you should make a
very good profit.

Who am I? You will 100% hear for me in near future! I will open my own
service with REAL one and honest service!! My only problem is web design and
how to build up a website. I’m a sport bettor, not a web designer. But I
will solve this problem in a week or two…

Regards,

Steve

I asked “Steve” to keep me posted. Later I received an email and a link for

URL: www.BetXpert.net
e-mail: info@betxpert.net

Then I noticed 2 points on this new service:

(1) It is a subscription service. I thought in the previous “Steve” email, he was suggesting the picks should be free for the customers after purchasing the system. Yet he is now also charging an ongoing fee.

(2) Furthermore, although in the previous email “Steve” says his was the “100% truly sure picks”, yet on his new website, the results section is showing at least one loss Not what I consider as consistent with his earlier words. Although I do not know if the new service is an honest service or not, but the above two points just fill me with any confidence. So, I decided not to sign up.

Rating 1/5 I don’t feel I can trust this system as it seems a bit fishy.

Click Here To Visit Ultimate Sports Betting Website

I was kindly sent a copy of this system by the author  upon request,  The first thing to noticed about the system is that the rules are extremely easy to follow and once you have been through the selection process a couple of times, it becomes second nature to implement your daily betting strategies. It took me between 5 and 15 minutes a day to go through the whole racing card for the day so no need to wallow through endless amounts of data as with some systems out there.

Unfortunately that was the only positive aspect I could attain with this system as the results which followed through the month were nothing short of calamitous!

With a starting bank of 100 Pts on the 1st of October and following the system to the letter we ended up with a bank of  -2.41 Pts on the 31st Oct so a cumulative flat stake profit of  – 102.41 Pts for the month. In actual fact the last day started off well with a 9/1 winner and I thought ‘oh, maybe a miracle is about to happen on the very last day!’

A big fat ‘NO’ was the answer to that query! This 9/1 winner was quickly followed by 5 losers, thus wiping out the entire bank, appropriately enough on the last day of the trial.

In fact at no point during the trial were we ever close to getting in profit and actually the trial could have come to an abrupt end a couple of weeks ago if not for a couple of face saving winners.

So I’m afraid to say I have to fail this system, obviously because of the results we have seen and also because of the sheer nerve of the author (whoever he may be) who has been waching too many ‘Disney’ movies lately, all with happy endings, and got somehow caught up in a fantastic fantasy world where the ‘magic’ horses from the ‘Racing Post’ come to rescue the beautiful princess and carry her off to the land of ‘profit’ called ‘Betfair’

Then they woke up and realised what a pile of rubbish they had created and thought ‘We’ll call it ‘Backing Allstars’ and flog it anyway to those poor ‘SOB’s’ who don’t know any better’

Thus ends my review and a solitary wish that someone somewhere gets wise to these so called betting ‘experts’ and pays them a visit with a ‘big stick’

Rating 1/5 Very well presented but not profitable at all

Click Here To Visit Backing Allstars Website

On the 8th of July the selection sent was identical to that of the Lowlay laying service. It’s fair to say that services can end with the same selections but this was blatant. Not only was the selection identical but the email sent from punter express was identical to that sent by Lowlay and the staking advice was copied word for word.

The people behind Lowlay tried to contact the punter express team but there emails went unanswered.

I emailed punter express with my concerns and they replied as follows:

“Hello Iain,

Our service is a legitimate service. We are not thieves and we don’t copy information from other websites. Very often is possible to find the best horse selection of the day that is similar or the same to other tipster services. Please feel free to ask me any other questions.

Best,

The Punter Express Team”

I did ask why they copied the email from Lowlay word for word and they said:

“Again this is just a coincidence. We never had these kinds of problems before. However we will make some changes on the structure of the email starting tomorrow. We already advised clickbank and explained what is going on.”

There is no way this was coincidence and changing the structure of the emails is an admission in my opinion.

The website now states that membership is closed but the doors may reopen at a later date. This is a marketing tactic I have seen on many occasions and I strongly urge that you don’t fall victim to it.

Punter express can’t be trusted in my opinion.

Rating 1/5 – Very poor in my opinion. Not reliable enough to use in the long-run and one to avoid.

Click here to visit The Punter Express Website

The system itself is based around virtual horse racing and is very simple to understand. It backs certain horses using a progressive staking plan to win a set amount each day.

You need to be in the bookies or online from around 9am until a winner is found at which point you would stop for the day and bank your profits.

To make the £120 a day profit a bank of £3800 is required and if a winner is not found you could potentially lose this whole amount in one day so this is not for the faint hearted.

When the system was released it was said that this had only happened once this year but I did warn that it would almost certainly happen again.

My concern was that once the bookies found out that the system was being used they would make the changes required and put an end to the so called loophole. The author said this couldn’t happen but I know of several loopholes in the past that were stopped when made public so in my opinion it could and would happen.

I hope people took note of my concerns as on the 29th of May and again on the 17th of June NO winners were found

The refund offer states you will get you money back if the system fails the day after it is purchased. What use is getting your money back if you have just lost upto £3800 using it?

I have always warned about progressive staking systems but progressive staking on virtual horse racing is simply suicidal in my opinion.

Rating 1/5 – Very poor in my opinion. Not reliable enough to use in the long-run and one to avoid.

Click here to visit The Virtual Racing Loophole Website

This is another classic case where the sales page is far superior than the product it is selling. All the usual marketing tactics are used although there is no real proof of winnings.

The sporting specialist is basically a collection of old and untested betting systems along with suicidal money management advice and other useless links.

Rating 1/5 – Very poor in my opinion. Not reliable enough to use in the long-run and one to avoid.

Click here to visit The Sporting Specialist Website

The betting blueprint is the latest to hit the market from Mr Brookes and his associates and it comes with all the usual marketing hype and cross promotional emails. Within a few hours of this being released I had 5 emails hyping the system up and which quite obviously all from the same group of people.

If only their systems were as good as there marketing skills then we could all get rich instead of just them reaping the rewards.

The betting blueprint system comes as a 55 page PDF document and contains a laying system and a trading system to be used on the online exchanges. Already only a few sentences in and they are using words like GREED and GUARANTEE which doesn’t install confidence in me. The stats charts for the favourites could be correct or just made up whose to know because unless your prepared to chase these stats down and double check them your going to have to take them on trust and the word trust does not fit well with this lot.

I cannot believe that anyone could dismiss the going in a race as trivially as they do and I suspect that they don’t have a clue about the way our weather can change in an instant and therefore drastically change the going, UNBELEIVABLE!!!!

I have just come across another saying that they use “I WILL BE HONEST WITH YOU” well that will be a first and they seem to take great delight in filling screen space with rudimental BLURB to make it look like your getting something different and great value for money, this does look like another re-vamp of countless previous so called systems that they have been peddling over the last 12 months or so.

Nearly at the end now and they are still using phrases like “THE ODDS WHICH ARE ALSO KNOWN AS PRICES” and “A FAVOURITE HAS THE SHORTEST ODDS”, how patronising can they get or do they think this is going to be mainly purchased by idiots that are still struggling with Janet and John books.

Conclusion

Most of this is very basic and has been covered before by them in previous promotions. On past history from this lot you’re likely to purchase and be disappointed as it has nothing new to offer to the informed punter.

Rating 1/5 – Very poor in my opinion. Not reliable enough to use in the long-run and one to avoid.

Click here to visit The Betting Blueprint Website