GeeGeez Lays – Final Review
GeeGeez Lays as the name suggests is a lay bets service, the selections are provided by the vendor from a password protected site, also available with this system is a free betting bot by the name of GLS Bot, this will lay the GeeGeez Lays for you without you being present at the computer at race time.
The amount of selections per day is variable, from a few to many, there are also days where multiple selections appear in a single race, no selections however, are sent on a Sunday.
Selections are available from 5am on the day of racing via a password protected web site or they can be automatically imported to the supplied robot that will place the bets for you at the time of your choosing. All the results in this review are based on using the robot and the recommended minimum/maximum odds.
The user selectable timing for the placing of the selections is in my opinion absolutely paramount, therefore any two users could report different returns depending on the time interval requested before the race starts.
3 month Results using a bank of 100 points at £5 a point on Betfair. Level stakes throughout.
Actual Lay Bets Placed in July: 178
157 Lays were Successful: 88.2%
21 Lays were Unsuccessful: 11.80% (Odds varied from 2.34 to 19.5)
Overall Profit for the Month: £43.70 – Subscription (£40) = £3.70
Average Odds for All Lays in July 9.30
Average Odds for Unsuccessful Lays 7.69 (i.e. The 11.8% that won)
Actual Lay Bets Placed in August: 209
186 Lays were Successful: 89.0%
23 Lays were Unsuccessful: 11.0%
Overall Loss for the Month: -£88.85 + Subscription (£40) = -£128.85
Average Odds for All Lays in July: 9.50
Average Odds for Unsuccessful Lays: 9.14 (i.e. the 11. 0% that won)
Actual Lay Bets Placed in September: 184
163 Lays were Successful: 88.6%
21 Lays were Unsuccessful: 11.4%
Overall Loss for the Month: -£178.10 + Subscription (£40) = -£218.10
Average Odds for All Lays in September: 9.19
Average Odds for Unsuccessful Lays: 10.1 (i.e. The 11.4% that won)
Total Profit/Loss: -£263.25
I have carried out this review over a three month period as I felt that one month would probably not do this system justice. Had I based my final review on the month of July alone, my analysis of this system may well have been neutral, the longer period has changed my views and bank considerably.
Overall then a truly disastrous result, not only for me personally but for the other subscribers to this system, some of whom may very well be unlucky to have taken an annual subscription. The loss in the bank together with the subscription costs add up to a very unhealthy position. Unfortunately the end of this review sees me in negative territory.
in my view, the subscriptions for this service are more than its worth (3 month subscription to the service cost me around £120,) and, as can be seen in the period of this review, not remotely successful, it may well be, that the system may show a profit in the longer term but I have to ask myself if the expense of continuing with a further extended subscription is worthwhile…… well, that has to be a resounding NO.
Rating: 1/5 High subscription rates and low monthly returns make this system unusable



