Yet another horse racing system that fails to deliver the results that are promised on the sales page. Because the system is based around a set of 9 simple rules I was able to quite easily run the system selection through past results to see how it performed.

On the sales page you will see a snap shot of results between the 04 Jan 2008 and the 09 Jan 2008 where the results are fantastic. How many times have I seen this before though. The vendor basically selects a profitable period of results to show but omits all the losing periods. Sadly people get sucked in all too easily and part with there hard earned money based on these facts alone.

The vendor states that a profit of £42.000 was made in 2007. I followed the rules to the letter and my results told a different story. Did I do things correctly you may ask?. I know I did as my selections during 2008 matched exactly to those shown on the website and to be honest I simply couldn’t go wrong.

Let me show you the results:

2004
Bets = 1817, Winners = 479, Strike Rate = 26%
Longest Winning Sequence = 6, Longest Losing Sequence = 26
£19.213 LOSS to £100 level stakes @ SP

2005
Bets = 1930, Winners = 485, Strike Rate = 25%
Longest Winning Sequence = 5, Longest Losing Sequence = 26
£15.089 LOSS to £100 level stakes @ SP

2006
Bets = 2149, Winners = 605, Strike Rate = 28%
Longest Winning Sequence = 6, Longest Losing Sequence = 32
£2991.00 LOSS to £100 level stakes @ SP

2007
Bets = 2354, Winners = 767, Strike Rate = 33%
Longest Winning Sequence = 6, Longest Losing Sequence = 13
£19.357 PROFIT to £100 level stakes @ SP

2008 (Ending March 27th)
Bets = 464, Winners = 157, Strike Rate = 34%
Longest Winning Sequence = 6, Longest Losing Sequence = 11
£965 LOSS to £100 level stakes @ SP

It’s easy to see what a waste of time and money buying the system ultra would be. With a total LOSS of almost £20.000 over the last 5 years being shown to £100 level stakes @ SP.

You didn’t see that on the web site did you?.

Rating 1/5 – Very poor in my opinion. Not reliable enough to use in the long-run and one to avoid.

The Website Is No Longer Active