My Secret Football System – Final Review
My secret football system claims to be a no nonsense system that you can use on the betting exchanges to win you guaranteed money. It also claims to be the only system you will ever need to win money on live football matches.
I got hold of a copy of this and not for the first time all I got was a poor example of the lay the draw and then back it after a goal has been scored system. As I have said before in a previous review, this system has been around for years and was originally sold by John Duncan and called the Football Cash Generator.
The author claims you will make £200+ per week using this system which is false advertising if ever I have seen it. This is based on one example within the manual which used an initial liability of £1000 on one successful football match where of course everything went to plan. There are no screen shots or proof that bets were actually placed either!
The system has many flaws and results can quite easily go the wrong way leaving you with an overall loss. To say you are guaranteed to win is ludicrous. Too many people use the system now which effects the odds and the chances of making a long term profit using it.
So who is behind this latest venture?
I have it on good authority that somebody called Richard Mark (probably not his real name) is behind this. This man, from Yorkshire, is a scammer who used to advertise on that favourite publication of scammers, the Exchange & Mart, back in the 1990s. He was selling football betting systems that promised all the usual riches etc. In reality these systems were just fixed odds perms that you could find from various gambling books at a fraction of the price, and guaranteed precisely nothing. He concocted several of these perms and made each into seem like a different system.
I have had a large amount of emails also from people who have asked for the promised refund but not surprisingly haven’t received it. If you brought this via PayPal then my advice is to inform them with immediate effect.
Rating 1/5 – Very poor in my opinion. Not reliable enough to use in the long-run and one to avoid.
