Laysoftware.com – Final Review
Laysoftware.com is the latest service to offer fully automated horse racing software that promises to make you £100’s on a daily basis. So who is behind the service and does it do what it says on the tin.
Finding out who is behind the service is very difficult as all the website ownership details are hidden. The only name mentioned on the website is Paul and no other names are mentioned in the emails they send.
I did a little research and it looks very likely to me that the people behind sure2profit who got a big thumbs down from me and many other review sites are also behind this. The mailing list signup forms are the same, they both use the same annoying exit scripts to prevent you from leaving the page and more importantly if you look at the disclaimer, privacy and earning disclaimer on both websites they are identical.
I rate each system on it’s own merits and don’t take the authors into account so does it do what it says on the tin?
The website promises to put your betting on auto pilot and suggests you can makes £100’s on a daily basis. The only proof to back these claims up are screenshots which cover five winning days. Where are all the other results including losing days?
When you join you gain access to the members area where the software is situated. The software is web based and you are required to enter your Betfair details and starting bank etc. The instructions to set the bot up are not
easy to understand but it is suggested that the default settings are used.
This is my experience of the software covering a period of 24 days using the default settings. A bank of £200 was initially used which was then increased to £500 in the hope of recouping the initial losses.
TOTAL PROFIT / LOSS
- £8.64
As you can see the the results have been quite poor and certainly nowhere near the results indicated on the sales page.
The profits on the website are shown using a £250 bank and this itself is a ridiculous claim as one of the few emails received from the admin team stated the following:
“Paul varies the stakes for you, and controls the betting, so you will probably have losses in the event he stops betting on his target if your bank is under £250.
You should have a minimum of £250 bank, and preferably £500 or more. Then, his strategy makes a reasonable profit. His account is actually funded to £2000 on the system, and is consistently profitable. Down to £1000 bank the profits are less proportionally, and lesser amounts are not so consistent, and under £250 it is likely to lose.”
Why don’t they show Pauls account using his £2000 bank so we can all see it then? If you need a £2000 bank then why not just say so on the sales page?
The cost of this service is a whopping £179.95 per month so I can imagine the starting bank required to make the subscription fee back alone would be huge.
Their customer service is appalling and they don’t answer queries which is very frustrating having paid such a large subscription fee.
There is no proof to back the sales page claims up whatsoever and at £179.95 there is only ever going to be one winner in my eyes and that’s the people behind the software whoever you are?
Rating 1/5 – Very poor in my opinion. Not reliable enough to use in the long-run and one to avoid.


